After several minutes of pondering and looking at keyword analyzers, you find the proper domain name for your new website. You see if it is available through your desired domain name company. If you discover that it is, you get excited because it seems that it'll be fairly worthwhile to your site. So, you join it, thinking that it's up for grabs, since your domain name registration firm has said it is available.

Then after a few months you get correspondence from a lawyer saying that your new domain name has violated one other company's trademark. You are now caught with a possible battle that could trigger you to lose your domain name, your status and possibly even worse. Thankfully, with domain name arbitration, there's a chance you may get out of such a situation and avoid any possible legal consequences.

What is domain name arbitration? It's a procedure by which the complainant and the unique holder of the domain name try to work out a reasonable settlement as to who actually has the rights to the domain name in question. The arbitration in itself is completed via the uniform domain name dispute resolution Policy, (also known as UDRP). This is a special arbitration methodology set forth by the ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) organization. It's used for many domain name disputes, as a result of it's cheaper and less time-consuming than 'traditional' litigation.

In order to initiate a domain name arbitration proceeding, a webmaster must go through a provider that has been approved by ICANN to handle such disputes. Once the arbitration begins, the provider will first determine if the complainant has merit in their claim. They will do this by evaluating whether the domain name in question is similar to a trademark or domain name set forth by the claimant.

They are going to then decide what rights the claimant has to the domain name together with whether or not the domain was chosen accidentally or with the intention of profiting from the claimant's model popularity. If it is discovered the domain name was chosen in bad faith, rights to will probably be granted to the claimant. In any other case, the unique proprietor will retain possession of the disputed domain name.

If both parties are just not happy with a site domain name arbitration proceeding, they'll problem the findings in a regular courtroom. An example of this occurred with Robert De Niro, when he tried to assert the rights to any domain name containing the phrase 'Tribeca.' He's still in courtroom trying to retain the rights to Tribeca.net, which has been claimed by another person.

In conclusion, domain name arbitration is a superb method to avoiding taking a site domain name dispute into a courtroom, athttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif least initially. There's the option to go to court if either facet feels an arbitration is not fair. Yet, for most site owners, the selections made by the UDRP panel are ok for them, since getting thehttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifir consul is a lot cheaper than going to a judge.

By: Sagar Jawale

More Information:

Learn more about domain name. Stop by Author Name's site where you can find out all about domain registration and what it can do for you.